Domain Docs
How the engineering skills should consume this repo’s domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
Before exploring, read these
Section titled “Before exploring, read these”CONTEXT.mdat the repo root, orCONTEXT-MAP.mdat the repo root if it exists — it points at oneCONTEXT.mdper context. Read each one relevant to the topic.docs/adr/— read ADRs that touch the area you’re about to work in. In multi-context repos, also checksrc/<context>/docs/adr/for context-scoped decisions.
If any of these files don’t exist, proceed silently. Don’t flag their absence; don’t suggest creating them upfront. The producer skill (/grill-with-docs) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
File structure
Section titled “File structure”Single-context repo (most repos):
/├── CONTEXT.md├── docs/adr/│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md└── src/Multi-context repo (presence of CONTEXT-MAP.md at the root):
/├── CONTEXT-MAP.md├── docs/adr/ ← system-wide decisions└── src/ ├── ordering/ │ ├── CONTEXT.md │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions └── billing/ ├── CONTEXT.md └── docs/adr/Use the glossary’s vocabulary
Section titled “Use the glossary’s vocabulary”When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in CONTEXT.md. Don’t drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn’t in the glossary yet, that’s a signal — either you’re inventing language the project doesn’t use (reconsider) or there’s a real gap (note it for /grill-with-docs).
Flag ADR conflicts
Section titled “Flag ADR conflicts”If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…